What's this? / Report Bad Ads
Latest News
Vatican

Vatican comments on situation of missing Chinese Bishop Shao Zhumin

June 26, 2017. Bishop Peter Shao Zhumin, from Wenzhou in Continental China, was taken into custody by Chinese police on Easter weekend 2017. While recognized as a bishop in the Catholic Church, he is an unofficial bishop or "underground” in China, since the Chinese government does not recognize him as religious.
Pope Francis

Pope Francis' complete schedule for Colombia trip

June 23, 2017. He will go to Colombia September 6-11.
Vatican

Bruno Marie Duffé, new secretary of the Department for Integral Development

June 16, 2017. Thepope has named French priest Bruno Marie Duffé, from Lyon, number two of the Dicastery for Promoting Integral Human Development. He will be in charge of one of the key offices in the Vatican Curia.
Pope Francis

Angela Merkel to meet with pope on June 17

June 9, 2017. The Vatican has confirmed that on Saturday, June 17, German Chancellor Angela Merkel will meet with Pope Francis. Both have previously met in Rome in May 2016, February 2015 and May 2013, two months after Pope Francis was elected pontiff.
Pope Francis

Pope Francis to meet with Venezuelan bishops on June 8

June 5, 2017. Pope Francis will meet with Venezuelan bishops next Thursday to discuss the situation their country is facing.
Vatican

New secretary of the Dicastery for Laity, Family and Life

May 31, 2017. The Brazilian priest Alexandre Awi Mello, the National Director of Brazil's Schönstatt Movement, will serve as the new secretary. He was born Rio de Janeiro in 1971, and ordained a priest in 2001.

Italian scientists says Holy Shroud dating inaccurate

2009-05-26

Italian scientists, however, are now debunking that this idea, claiming that the dating test did not work and that the laboratory hid errors.

Vatican insider Marco Tossati has repeated vital calculations and says that the original test was not valid.

Marco Tossati
Author, “Investigation of the Holy Shroud”

"The labs didn’t publish very many details. And it was evident that the ones they did publish had an error. It sounds like a small mistake, but it’s huge, because it means that the margin of trust of the entire test is well below the minimum that the laboratories stated."

The original carbon 14 test was performed in three parts by three separate laboratories that each tested on an eight centimeter piece cut from the shroud.

The discrepancy came when all three laboratories reported different results.

Marco Tossati
Author, “Investigation of the Holy Shroud”

"We’re not talking about religion. We’re talking about numbers that don’t leave room for discussion. The numbers are what they are. The test was not trustworthy, and they should explain why this is the case. They ended up with discrepancies that render the test invalid."

Scientists don’t consider carbon-14 dating a perfect science and when used it’s usually tested against other methods. But it was a small detail that gave way to a discrepancy that, evidently, all three labs knew about.

Marco Tossati
Author, “Investigation of the Holy Shroud”

"These same laboratories have had faulty results in the past. They said the tablecloth of one of the scientists mother-in-laws was 300 years old. Or that the bones of a mummy from Ibis dated from 1,500 years before Christ, and the cloth on her body from 200 years after Christ."

Until now, the carbon-14 test was the only method that rendered the Holy Shroud a fabrication. All other tests pointed the other way, suggesting the shroud was the original cloth that wrapped the body of Christ.

That’s why Marco Tossati and others are calling for new tests to determine the truth behind this historical piece of cloth that remains timeless.

JMB/RS