{"id":52402,"date":"2015-02-25T20:15:18","date_gmt":"2015-02-25T19:15:18","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www1.romereports.com\/2015\/02\/25\/pope-s-offensive-phrase-generates-controversy-between-mexico-and-the-vatican\/"},"modified":"2015-02-25T20:15:18","modified_gmt":"2015-02-25T19:15:18","slug":"pope-s-offensive-phrase-generates-controversy-between-mexico-and-the-vatican","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.romereports.com\/en\/2015\/02\/25\/pope-s-offensive-phrase-generates-controversy-between-mexico-and-the-vatican\/","title":{"rendered":"Pope's offensive phrase generates controversy between Mexico and the Vatican"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>A private e-mail between Pope Francis and a friend has sparked diplomatic wrangling between Mexico and the Holy See.<\/p>\n<p>When he was cardinal of Buenos Aires, the Pope supported the Alameda Foundation. Led by his friend Gustavo Vera, it fights against slave labor and human trafficking.<\/p>\n<p>The Pope wrote an e-mail to Vera on February 21, remembering their time to together.<\/p>\n<p>'Dear Brother:<\/p>\n<p>Thanks for your email. I see you are working as hard as you can. I often ask God to protect you and your coworkers. I hope that we will be able to avoid Mexicanization before it's too late. I talked to some Mexican bishops and it is terrifying.'<\/p>\n<p>The recipient published the message on his foundation's website, and it immediately caused a serious problem. It wasn't resolved when he added that the Pope expressed concern for the spread of the drug cartels.<\/p>\n<p>The government of Mexico asked the Vatican on Monday to formally clarify what the Pope meant.<\/p>\n<p>MARIANO PALACIOS ALCOCER<br \/>\nMexico's Ambassador to the Vatican<br \/>\n'... by the order of the Government of Mexico, this embassy presented a verbal note to the Secretary of State.'<\/p>\n<p>A response came in less than 24 hours. First, Antoine Camilleri, the number two Vatican foreign minister, summoned the ambassador to give an official explanation.<\/p>\n<p>MARIANO PALACIOS ALCOCER<br \/>\nMexico's Ambassador to the Vatican<br \/>\n'We talked about the context in which the note was written. He explained to us that it was a personal correspondence. He told me it was a private and informal e-mail'.<\/p>\n<p>The Vatican then published a note by the Secretariat of State. It was sent in four languages. The statement clarifies that:<\/p>\n<p>'The Pope did not in any way intend to hurt the feelings of the Mexican people. \u00a0He nurtures a special affection for them. He does not underestimate the government's commitment to the fight against drug trafficking.'<\/p>\n<p>It says that, 'the Pope intended nothing else but to comment on the gravity of the phenomenon of drug trafficking afflicting Mexico and other Latin American countries.\u00e2?\u009d<\/p>\n<p>MARIANO PALACIOS ALCOCER<br \/>\nMexico's Ambassador to the Vatican<br \/>\n'Well, I can say that it was a timely response, a response that showed closeness to the people and government of Mexico.'<\/p>\n<p>The situation was resolved diplomatically. However, someone receiving a private communication from the Pope may now think twice before publishing it.<\/p>\n<p>JMB\/ATO<br \/>\nRR<br \/>\nVM<br \/>\n- PR<br \/>\nUp: MPI<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>February 25, 2015. ;In a private email, Pope Francis warned of \"Mexicanization\" in Argentina.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":0,"featured_media":52403,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[25],"tags":[],"acf":{"video":"http:\/\/youtu.be\/enFRDs6sQw0","video_descarga":"http:\/\/attuale.romereports.com\/news\/","international_url":"http:\/\/romereports.com.edgesuite.net\/news\/bmessicanizzazioneint.mov","type":"rrp","newsletter":"si"},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.romereports.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/52402"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.romereports.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.romereports.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.romereports.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=52402"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.romereports.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/52402\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.romereports.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/52403"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.romereports.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=52402"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.romereports.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=52402"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.romereports.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=52402"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}